When it comes to buying and selling real estate, it is important for sellers to understand their duty to disclose any material defects in the property. Failure to disclose such defects can lead to legal consequences, as highlighted in the case of Everts v. Parkinson. In this article, we will explore the seller’s duty to disclose defects in real estate and the implications of failing to fulfill this duty.
Duty to Disclose Material Defects
One of the most important responsibilities that sellers have when selling a property is to disclose any material defects that may affect the value or desirability of the property. Material defects are issues with the property that are not readily apparent but would significantly impact the decision of a buyer to purchase the property or the price that they are willing to pay.
It is worth noting that the duty to disclose material defects may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific laws governing real estate transactions in that area. However, in many jurisdictions, sellers are required to disclose any material defects that they are aware of or should have been aware of through reasonable diligence.
For sellers, it is important to understand that failure to disclose material defects can have serious legal consequences. Buyers may bring legal action against sellers for fraudulent misrepresentation, concealment, or nondisclosure if they can prove that the seller intentionally or negligently failed to disclose a material defect.
The Case of Everts v. Parkinson
The case of Everts v. Parkinson, decided in 2001, provides a clear example of the seller’s duty to disclose material defects in real estate. In this case, the sellers failed to disclose extensive repairs that had been done to the property to the buyers.
The buyers, upon discovering the repairs after the sale, brought legal action against the sellers, claiming fraud and seeking damages. The court ruled in favor of the buyers, stating that the sellers had a duty to disclose the repairs as they constituted a material defect in the property.
This case emphasizes the importance of sellers being transparent and forthcoming about any repairs or other material defects in a property. Failure to disclose such defects can lead to legal consequences and financial liabilities for sellers.
Consequences of Failing to Disclose Material Defects
Failure to disclose material defects not only exposes sellers to potential legal action, but it can also tarnish their reputation and result in financial losses. When buyers discover undisclosed material defects after the sale, they may feel deceived and betrayed, leading to a breakdown in trust between the parties involved.
In addition to legal consequences, sellers who fail to disclose material defects may face financial repercussions. If a buyer discovers a material defect after the sale, they may seek compensation for the cost of repairs or the diminished value of the property due to the defect.
Furthermore, failing to disclose material defects can lead to negative word-of-mouth, impact future sales, and potentially harm the seller’s chances of selling the property at the desired price. Real estate transactions often rely heavily on the reputation of the seller, and a reputation for dishonesty or failure to disclose defects can significantly affect future transactions.
Meeting the Duty of Disclosure
To avoid legal and financial consequences, it is crucial for sellers to meet their duty of disclosure and provide buyers with all relevant information about material defects in the property. Here are a few steps sellers can take to fulfill this duty:
- Conduct a thorough inspection: Before listing the property for sale, sellers should have the property inspected by a qualified professional to identify any potential material defects.
- Create a disclosure statement: Sellers should create a disclosure statement that provides comprehensive information about any known material defects in the property. This may include issues such as structural problems, water damage, mold, or any significant repairs or renovations.
- Be honest and transparent: Sellers should be upfront and honest about any known material defects. It is essential to provide accurate and complete information to potential buyers to maintain trust and avoid any accusations of fraud or misrepresentation.
- Document all disclosures: Sellers should keep a record of all disclosures made to potential buyers, including the disclosure statement and any additional conversations or written communication regarding material defects.
- Consult with a real estate professional: Sellers may also consider seeking guidance from a real estate professional to ensure they fully understand their duty to disclose and comply with all legal requirements.
By following these steps and being proactive in disclosing material defects, sellers can protect themselves from legal consequences, maintain their reputation, and ensure a smooth and ethical real estate transaction.





The seller’s duty to disclose material defects in real estate is a crucial aspect of any real estate transaction. Sellers must be transparent and forthcoming about any material defects that may affect the value or desirability of the property. Failing to disclose such defects can lead to legal consequences, financial liabilities, and damage to the seller’s reputation.
By conducting thorough inspections, creating disclosure statements, being honest and transparent, documenting all disclosures, and seeking professional guidance, sellers can fulfill their duty to disclose and ensure a fair and successful real estate transaction.
Video related to Title: Seller’s Duty to Disclose Defects in Real Estate

A tech-savvy realtor, David merges innovation with real estate wisdom in his blog. With a focus on emerging trends and cutting-edge tools, he empowers his readers to navigate the ever-evolving landscape of property transactions.